On a tense Day 3 of the first Test between India and England at Headingley, an unusual scene unfolded when Rishabh Pant lost his cool after the on-field umpires denied India’s repeated request to change the ball. The incident not only highlighted the intense competitive spirit of the match but also brought attention to the rising frustration within the Indian camp during England’s strong batting reply.
The episode occurred during the 61st over of England’s first innings. At that point, England had started to recover strongly from an early collapse, with Ollie Pope and Joe Root putting together a resilient partnership. Indian pacers, led by Jasprit Bumrah and Mohammed Siraj, had been trying to extract movement from the old ball but appeared increasingly unhappy with its condition. After multiple deliveries seemed to lose their zip, Pant, captaining India in the absence of Rohit Sharma, appealed to the umpires for a ball change.
Umpire Paul Reiffel inspected the ball, using the ring gauge to determine its shape, and found it to be within the acceptable limits. However, Pant persisted, believing the ball had lost its seam and hardness. When the umpires refused again, a visibly annoyed Pant tossed the ball in frustration toward the ground, sending it bouncing toward Mohammed Siraj at mid-on. The reaction drew gasps from some spectators and murmurs in the commentary box, as it was clear the Indian wicketkeeper was not pleased with the decision.
Commentators speculated whether Pant’s actions might attract scrutiny under the ICC’s Code of Conduct. Level 1 and Level 2 offences under the code include showing dissent at umpiring decisions or throwing the ball in an inappropriate manner. While no official action was immediately taken, match referee Chris Broad is expected to review the incident post-day.
India’s concern over the ball condition wasn’t merely out of frustration—it had tactical implications. The Indian bowlers had relied heavily on reverse swing and seam movement on a dry Headingley pitch. A newer ball would have given them an edge, especially against England’s middle and lower order. With the old ball losing bite, England’s batters found it easier to settle in and rotate strike, particularly Ollie Pope, who was fluent throughout his century.
Despite the drama, India struck just after the ball-change dispute, with Prasidh Krishna dismissing Pope for 106, caught behind by Pant himself. Siraj then struck soon after, removing Ben Stokes with a well-directed short ball. But England continued to fight, with Harry Brook anchoring the innings and pushing the hosts toward a more respectable total. At lunch, England were 327 for 5, still trailing by 144 runs but showing signs of closing the gap.
Rishabh Pant’s moment of frustration reflected not just a captain’s desperation for control but also the mounting pressure India was under after England began clawing back into the match. His reaction, though out of character, served as a stark reminder of how fine the margins can be in Test cricket, where one ball can change the course of the match.
India will hope that the intensity shown by Pant’s translates into disciplined aggression in the sessions to come. The team remains in command, but England’s gritty response has ensured that the contest is far from over.
For more news updates, follow 12B Sports India Facebook .