
India’s innings in the third ODI against South Africa was built around a composed 74 from KL Rahul, but the hosts were ultimately bowled out for 285, a total that proved insufficient as South Africa chased it down to avoid a series whitewash. While Rahul’s knock provided structure and stability at the top, India were unable to convert a solid platform into a truly imposing score.
Batting first, India began with clarity of purpose. Rahul, opening the innings, set the tone with a controlled approach, prioritising strike rotation and boundary placement rather than early aggression. His timing through the off side and willingness to take singles ensured the scoreboard kept moving without exposing the middle order too early.
The powerplay was productive without being explosive. India avoided early damage and looked well placed to build a total beyond 300. Rahul’s calm presence allowed his partner to play with freedom, and the early partnerships suggested India were in control of the innings.
As the innings progressed, Rahul continued to anchor, absorbing pressure when South Africa’s bowlers tightened their lines. He handled pace comfortably and was particularly effective against length deliveries, punching the ball into gaps and keeping the run rate healthy. His half-century came without fuss, a reflection of an innings built on patience and game awareness.
However, the middle overs exposed India’s key issue. While Rahul held one end, wickets fell at regular intervals at the other. South Africa’s bowlers struck at crucial moments, preventing India from building long, momentum-shifting partnerships. Each time India looked set to accelerate, a breakthrough halted progress.
Rahul’s dismissal marked a turning point. With the anchor gone, India’s innings lost its sense of control. The middle and lower order attempted to lift the scoring rate, but the lack of set batters made sustained acceleration difficult. Instead of a late surge, India found themselves managing damage.
South Africa’s bowling in the final phase was disciplined and intelligent. Variations in pace, tight lines, and smart field placements forced India into riskier shots. The wickets at the death meant India were unable to fully capitalise on the final overs, getting bowled out rather than batting through the 50.
Being dismissed for 285 summed up India’s innings — competitive, but slightly undercooked given the start. On a surface that rewarded good batting, another 15 to 20 runs could have significantly altered the pressure during the chase.
For KL Rahul, the innings was a reminder of his value at the top of the order. His 74 was technically sound and tactically mature, providing India with exactly the kind of foundation required in a must-set game. However, one steady innings was not enough without stronger support through the middle.
For South Africa, the bowling effort reflected improved execution compared to earlier matches. Their ability to strike at regular intervals and deny India a late flourish proved decisive later in the contest.
In hindsight, India will view this innings as a missed opportunity. The platform was there, the conditions were favorable, but the inability to bat deep and finish strong left the door open. Rahul’s calm and control stood out, but cricket demands collective momentum — and on this occasion, India fell just short of turning a solid start into a match-winning total.
12BET Shortlisted for Sportsbook Operator of the Year at SBC Awards 2025
