South African all-rounder Nadine de Klerk sparked debate in the cricketing world after her match-winning performance of 84 not out against India in the ICC Women’s World Cup 2025. Following her side’s 3-wicket victory, De Klerk raised questions about India’s use of “injury time” tactics during the match, suggesting that the delays may have disrupted South Africa’s momentum at crucial junctures.
In a candid post-match interview, De Klerk revealed her observations, stating that several pauses in play were used strategically by the Indian side. “There were a few moments where it felt like the team was taking time for injuries, but it seemed to work out quite well for them,” she remarked. While she acknowledged that the tactics did not ultimately prevent South Africa’s win, she suggested that the breaks may have allowed India to regroup and calm the pressure, particularly after losing key wickets in the middle overs.
The controversy comes after India’s innings collapsed from 102 for 6 to 251 all out, even after a late surge from Richa Ghosh, who scored a blazing 94 off 77 balls from the lower order. The strategic pauses reportedly helped India manage player fatigue and re-assess their approach in the field, but De Klerk’s comments have highlighted a growing concern over gamesmanship in international cricket, especially in the high-stakes environment of the World Cup.
Despite the distraction, South Africa’s chase was anchored by De Klerk herself. Her 84* came under immense pressure as she negotiated both the Indian bowling attack and a challenging pitch. Alongside teammates Laura Wolvaardt, who scored 70, and Chloe Tryon, with 49 runs, De Klerk’s innings ensured South Africa chased down 252 runs successfully, completing a historic victory. Her performance demonstrated skill, composure, and the ability to remain unfazed by interruptions and tactical delays from the opposition.
Cricket analysts have noted that while “injury tactics” are not officially discouraged, they remain controversial. Gamesmanship that slows play can impact the rhythm of batters and bowlers alike, potentially influencing outcomes in tight matches. De Klerk’s comments are likely to reignite discussions around whether stricter guidelines should be enforced regarding time management and player injuries in competitive cricket.
India’s management has not publicly responded to the accusations, focusing instead on the upcoming matches of the World Cup. The team, led by Smriti Mandhana and Shubman Gill in their respective formats, will aim to stabilize their top order, which has been a recurring concern in the tournament. Critics suggest that while tactical delays may provide temporary advantage, consistent performance with bat and ball remains the ultimate determinant of success.
For De Klerk, the match highlighted her leadership and finishing ability, while also bringing to light the tactical nuances that can define modern women’s cricket. Her willingness to speak candidly about India’s approach underscores the competitive nature of the World Cup and the fine margins that often separate victory from defeat.
As the tournament progresses, the spotlight may remain on how teams manage momentum, both through on-field strategies and the sometimes-contentious use of “injury time.” De Klerk’s observations remind fans and players alike that cricket is as much a mental game as it is a physical contest, with every decision — whether overt or subtle — potentially influencing the course of a match.
12BET Shortlisted for Sportsbook Operator of the Year at SBC Awards 2025