The International Cricket Council (ICC) is actively exploring a controversial restructuring of the Test cricket format into a two-tier system, a move that could significantly alter the global landscape of the longest form of the game. The proposal, which is still under discussion, could come into effect after the current Future Tours Programme ends in 2027 and has already ignited strong responses from cricketing veterans and smaller Test-playing nations.
Under the proposed system, Test teams would be divided into two divisions based on performance, with top-ranked nations like Australia, India, England, and South Africa forming the first tier. Nations such as West Indies, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, Ireland, and Afghanistan could be relegated to a second tier with fewer fixtures and less financial and broadcast exposure. This model is aimed at increasing the commercial appeal of Test cricket by focusing on high-profile matchups between top-tier teams, aligning more closely with the growing influence of the T20 format.
However, the proposal has faced sharp criticism. Legendary West Indies captain Clive Lloyd has called the idea “terrible” and “very disturbing,” warning that it would damage the development of Test cricket in emerging and historically significant cricketing nations. Lloyd emphasized that the West Indies, once a dominant Test force, have contributed immensely to the global game and deserve support, not sidelining. He also highlighted the economic and logistical challenges of running cricket across multiple island nations and stressed the need for inclusive reforms rather than exclusionary policies.
Lloyd’s concerns are echoed by several other former players and analysts who argue that a rigid two-tier model without promotion or relegation would turn Test cricket into an elitist format. Critics warn that isolating lower-ranked teams could lead to a drop in standards, funding, and fan engagement, effectively spelling the end of competitive red-ball cricket in several regions. Former England pacer Steven Finn labeled the proposal as “greedy,” suggesting that it could erode the soul of Test cricket in pursuit of commercial gains.
Supporters of the two-tier concept believe it can bring structure and clarity to Test scheduling, particularly at a time when T20 leagues are monopolizing the global calendar. With packed international itineraries and player workload concerns, proponents argue that focusing on top-tier rivalries could maintain the format’s relevance and protect player well-being.
The ICC has yet to finalize any decision, and key discussions are expected later this year among top cricket boards, including the BCCI, ECB, and Cricket Australia. While the proposed system may eliminate scheduled tours like Australia’s future Test series against the West Indies, it is being framed as a potential reset to streamline competition and maximize revenue.
Ultimately, the debate centers on whether Test cricket should prioritize competitive equality and global growth or shift toward a high-stakes elite competition model. The outcome of these deliberations will have long-term consequences for the structure, reach, and soul of international Test cricket.