Shahid Afridi, Pakistan’s former cricket captain, has reignited the debate about cricketing ties between Pakistan and India. In a recent statement, Afridi emphasized that Pakistan cricket should strive to be self-sufficient and principled. He argued that if India refuses to play in Pakistan, there is no justification for Pakistan to participate in cricket events hosted in India.
Afridi’s remarks come amidst ongoing tensions surrounding the ICC Champions Trophy 2025. Scheduled to take place in Pakistan, the tournament has faced roadblocks due to India’s reluctance to play in Pakistan. Instead, India has proposed a hybrid model, allowing its matches to be held at neutral venues like Dubai.
This arrangement has been met with resistance from the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), which has rejected the hybrid model outright, viewing it as an unfair precedent. The ICC, however, appears inclined to approve the model for future events through 2027 to accommodate political and logistical sensitivities.
Afridi, while supporting PCB’s stance, criticized the ICC for not ensuring equal participation conditions for all member nations. He called on the cricketing body to prioritize fairness over financial gains and maintain the integrity of international cricket. Afridi also referenced Pakistan’s willingness to tour India multiple times, even amid strained political relations, as a reason for reciprocal action.
This situation has far-reaching implications. If unresolved, it could influence Pakistan’s participation in the 2026 T20 World Cup, co-hosted by India and Sri Lanka. Furthermore, the PCB has invested significantly in upgrading infrastructure for the Champions Trophy, underscoring its commitment to hosting the event within Pakistan.
Afridi’s call for self-reliance also touched on broader issues in Pakistan cricket. He expressed concern over inconsistent policies and a lack of player grooming, citing these as barriers to the national team’s sustained success. His remarks about the PCB’s decision-making, including changes in leadership and team captains, reflect his belief in a more stable and strategic approach to cricket administration.
The crux of Afridi’s argument highlights a broader narrative: the intertwining of politics and sports. While cricket has often been a bridge between the two nations, the current impasse risks creating long-term divides in the sport.