
Will Ashes be the stepping stone for England’s altered Bazball, especially against the acid test that Australia will throw at it?
Will Ashes 2025/26 be the making of Bazball 2.0?
Test cricket’s harshest test has traditionally been the Ashes in Australia, and the upcoming series presents England with the ultimate stress test. They have had a significant psychological and artistic transformation under the guidance of Brendon McCullum and Ben Stokes.
Shortly after McCullum and new captain Stokes were named head coaches, the term “Bazball” emerged informally. The ideal psychological setting for this new style to thrive was created by McCullum, a naturally aggressive player, and Stokes, a captain known for his proactive attitude.
In England, this proactive approach had dramatic results right away. For a team that had been struggling for a long time, it was liberating. Before the regime change, they had a pitiful 6% win rate in the 17 Tests; since then, they have had a strong 61% winning rate overall. A series of record-breaking fourth-innings chases in 2022, in which England successfully pursued four targets of 275 or more, including a historic 378 runs against India, exemplified the spectacular highs.
Later that year, they made a daring declaration against Pakistan in Rawalpindi, offering the hosts an alluring target of 343 runs, which ultimately resulted in a famous 74-run England triumph. This was instantly praised as evidence of the optimistic, “find a way to win” ethos.
But a closer look uncovers a glaring spatial reliance that highlights Bazball 1.0’s shortcomings. Since the summer of 2022, England’s home win percentage has been 68%, but their away win percentage is 50%. This 26% difference indicates that the revolution is reliant on neutered designed pitches.
The environmental background of English cricket is closely related to this statistical disparity. Bazball’s domestic success has depended on wickets that are purposefully made to be flatter and less harsh than conventional English seaming Test surfaces.
The king of swing and seam James Anderson publicly bemoaned how “like kryptonite” the Edgbaston pitch was for him during the 2023 Ashes Test. Additionally, the risk associated with frantic batting is significantly reduced by the narrower boundaries at many English Test grounds.
When those environmental cushions are gone, this high-risk technique will inevitably result in dramatic collapses. The team’s dramatic eight-wicket loss to Sri Lanka at home, which some have called the worst batting of the Bazball era, and their quick collapse against India in Rajkot, where a solid position of 224 for 2 turned into 319 all out, serve as sobering reminders of the approach’s inherent volatility.
The main storyline for this Ashes series is that England has learnt their lesson and is now steering clear of Bazball 1.0’s unrestrained, all-out assault.
A major beneficiary of the aggressive strategy, Ben Duckett, has acknowledged that the side is changing from being “entertaining, reckless at times.” Rather, “reading moments”—a strategic maturation—are the main focus. When faced with five challenging overs at the end of the day, Duckett emphasised the necessity to “just get through it” and choose survival over chasing runs at all costs in order to be present the next morning.
The opposition has taken notice of this modest but crucial evolution. England are now “thinking about ways to win games, not being totally reckless,” according to Australian spinner Nathan Lyon, while Steve Smith has stated that England has begun to play the scenario. This change signifies Bazball 2.0’s inevitable birth.
Australia will be a formidable test. The pitches are perfect for an equitable game between bat and ball, commencing with Perth’s speed and genuine bounce. These are surfaces that honour self-control and good decision.
Despite losing Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins to injury for the first Test, Australia’s seasoned pace attack is still capable of punishing careless batting.
For the sake of the series, Hazlewood’s defeat is disheartening in addition to Cummins’. When it comes to bowlers that have an aggressive approach, Hazlewood is perhaps the most dangerous. His absence from Perth will be visible and depressing for Australia.
The England team will remain optimistic when they play in Australia. We shouldn’t anticipate a return to their unrestrained Bazball 1.0 days. But what we should anticipate is a highly competitive group that has at last developed into a tough, aggressive, and strategic organisation. Their desire to put in the effort necessary to succeed in Australia’s harsh conditions will determine their success rather than run rate.
The balance has unavoidably moved in favour of England with the loss of Cummins and Hazlewood for Perth.
